By Sunil Gavaskar has expressed reservations about India’s bowling strategy, pointing out the lack of a “Plan B” during crucial matches. His criticisms stem from recent performances, particularly the Boxing Day Test against Australia, in which he watched Indian bowlers struggle to modify their techniques when faced with difficult conditions.
Key Points from Gavaskar’s Critique
* Lack of Adaptability: Gavaskar observed that when Australian batter Sam Konstas began scoring freely, India’s bowlers appeared to run out of ideas. He pointed out that they lacked alternate strategies, allowing partnerships to grow and placing India at a disadvantage in the match.
* Specific Performance Issues: He questioned the bowlers’ high economy rates, implying that they were not successfully carrying out their strategies. Mohammed Siraj, for example, had an economy rate of more than four, and other prominent bowlers gave runs at rates higher than three. This inefficiency highlighted a failure to modify their strategy dependent on the match scenario.
* Strategic Execution: Gavaskar underlined that good bowling necessitates making batters play and providing wicket-taking opportunities. He mentioned how good methods could lead to dismissals and emphasized how Indian bowlers did not capitalize on such opportunities during the match.
* General Team Management Observations: His criticisms went beyond individual performances and criticized Rohit Sharma’s overall team management and captaincy. Gavaskar indicated that improved strategic preparation and adaptability were required in response to a game’s changing dynamics.
Gavaskar’s comments reflect a greater concern about India’s bowling unit’s readiness and strategic depth, especially in high-pressure scenarios against powerful opponents such as Australia.
